Supmea Knowledge Hub: answers on process measurement from Supmea's application engineers geo@supmea.comWhatsApp +86 133 6211 7863
SUPMEAKnowledge
Hub
Request a quote

Electromagnetic vs ultrasonic flow meter: which should you choose?

By Supmea Application EngineeringPublished Topic: Flow
Short answer

Choose an electromagnetic flow meter for conductive liquids (water, wastewater, slurries, chemicals) when you can install a spool piece and want the most stable accuracy, typically ±0.5% of reading or better. Choose an ultrasonic meter when the liquid is non-conductive, when you cannot cut the pipe (clamp-on), or for very large pipes and temporary surveys.

Key points

  • Magmeters need conductivity; ultrasonic meters do not.
  • Clamp-on ultrasonic installs without shutdown.
  • Magmeters tolerate solids and slurry better; ultrasonic transit-time prefers clean liquid.
  • Both have no moving parts and no pressure loss (inline).

How each one measures

An electromagnetic meter applies a magnetic field across the pipe; the moving conductive liquid induces a voltage proportional to velocity, picked up by electrodes, which is Faraday's law. An ultrasonic transit-time meter sends sound pulses with and against the flow; the time difference is proportional to velocity (background).

Electromagnetic flow meter working principle diagramcoilcoilBUconductive liquid, velocity vU = k · B · v · D (Faraday's law of induction)electrodes pick up the induced voltage
Figure 1. Electromagnetic flow meter working principle diagram. Illustration: Supmea application engineering.

Side-by-side comparison

CriterionElectromagneticUltrasonic (transit-time)
Liquid must be conductiveYes (≥2–50 µS/cm by model)No
Typical accuracy±0.5% of reading (±0.3% selected)±1% inline; ±1–2% clamp-on, installation-dependent
Solids / slurryGood with suitable linerLimited; Doppler type for high solids
InstallationSpool piece, pipe cutInline or clamp-on without cutting
Large pipes (>DN1000)Heavy and costlyClamp-on cost barely changes with size
Straight run~10 D up / 5 D downOften longer; profile-sensitive
Typical usesWater, wastewater, chemical, pulpOils, DI water, HVAC retrofit, surveys

Selection rules

  1. Is the liquid conductive above the meter's minimum? If not, use ultrasonic, turbine or Coriolis.
  2. Can you shut down and cut the pipe? If not, use clamp-on ultrasonic.
  3. Does it carry solids or slurry? Then use electromagnetic with a PU or rubber liner.
  4. Is it for billing or permit records? An electromagnetic meter with a verified calibration is usually preferred.

Related questions

Which is more accurate?

In most water applications, an inline magmeter: its reading is less sensitive to velocity profile than a clamp-on ultrasonic installation.

Can ultrasonic meters measure wastewater?

Transit-time meters struggle with heavy solids and bubbles; Doppler ultrasonic or electromagnetic meters are better suited.

Sources and further reading

Product specifications quoted here are summarised from Supmea datasheets. Confirm the figures for your exact model before final design.

Get a selection and quotation from an application engineer

Send the medium, pipe size, flow or level range, temperature, pressure and required output. You'll get a recommended model, the datasheet and a quotation.

Tell us about the application

Fill in what you know. An application engineer replies with a model and datasheet, usually within one working day (Beijing time, UTC+8).

Both buttons open your own WhatsApp or email app with the message filled in. Nothing is stored on this website.